Atchley

(HC) Palmer v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20232:19-cv-01999California1,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARLON PALMER, No. 2:19-cv-1999 KJM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER TAMMY FOSS, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 18, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. F. & R., ECF No. 19. Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Obj., ECF No. 25. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. For the reasons below, the court adopts the findings and recommendations. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.