Fox

(PC) Birrell v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20232:16-cv-01818California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., No. 2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ROBERT W. FOX, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jeffrey Scott Sargent filed this civil rights action with other plaintiffs seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 14, 2022 and October 11, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, ECF Nos. 63 and 65, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections have been filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.