Pallares

(HC) Williams v. Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20232:20-cv-01519California924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TANISHIA SAVANNAH WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:20-cv-01519-TLN-JDP (HC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

v. CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BE

DENIED AS MOOT AND THE JUDGMENT

MICHAEL PALLARES, DISMISSING HER PETITION AS

UNEXHAUSTED BE VACATED

Respondent.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS

13 ECF No. 51 14 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed her initial petition on July 29, 2020. ECF No. 1. In June 2021, she moved to stay this action, citing the difficulty of litigating during the ongoing pandemic. ECF No. 25. On November 4, 2021, the then-assigned magistrate judge recommended that her motion to stay the petition be denied and that her claims be dismissed for failure to exhaust in state court. ECF No. 31. Those recommendations were adopted by the then- assigned district judge on February 9, 2022, ECF No. 36, and this case was closed. Petitioner moved to reopen the case on February 18,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.