Gilbert v. Oakdale Shopping Center L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-01305-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

v. RELIEF FROM SERVICE DEADLINE OAKDALE SHOPPING CENTER L.L.C., (Doc. 16) et al. 13 Defendants. 14 15 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Darren Gilbert’s (“Plaintiff”) request to extend the time for service of the summons and complaint on Defendant Oakdale Shopping Center L.L.C. (“Defendant Oakdale”). (Doc. 16.) Defendants Monica Diane Willey and Best Deal Food Company, Inc. have appeared and answered the complaint. (See Docs. 8, 14.) Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the time limit for service of the summons and complaint and provides, in relevant part, as follows:

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court— on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be…