(PS) Williams v. State of CA Workers Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20232:22-cv-00302California425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APRIL PREMO WILLIAMS, No. 2:22-cv-00302 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD and THE HOME DEPOT, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 24. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.