Parsons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Composite Resources, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-02352-KJM-DMC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Derek R. Parsons, 1S Defendant. 16 The court previously granted defendant Derek Parsons’s motion to dismiss without leave toamend. See Prev. Order, ECF No. 26. Plaintiff Composite Resources, Inc. now moves to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e). As explained in this order, Composite has not 20 identified relevant changes in the law or evidence, has not shown the court’s decision rested on clear error, and has not established the court’s order was manifestly unjust, as would be necessary 22 to obtain relief under Rule 59(e), so its motion is denied. 23 I. BACKGROUND Composite originally pursued claims against a different defendant, Recon Medical, LLC, 25 in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. See Compl. {fj 7-25, ECF No. 1. The Nevada court found Recon liable for unfair…