Block
Block v. Cortez
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20231:22-cv-00908California185 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9} HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-00908-JLT-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE
12 JOHANNA R. CORTEZ, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
Defendants. (ECF No. 27) 14 On January 17, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 27.) In light 16 of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i1); Wilson 17 v.City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice, 18 with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).