(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20232:22-cv-01205California1,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-cv-1205 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former inmate at the Sacramento County Jail, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint filed on July 7, 2022, is before the court for screening. As set forth below, the complaint contains no factual allegations and fails to state a claim. Plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint. I. In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) The certificate portion of the request was not completed by plaintiff’s institution of incarceration, and plaintiff did not file a certified copy of his jail trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Based on plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.