Grannis

(PC) Branch v. Grannis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20231:08-cv-01655California4,423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS BRANCH, Case No. 1:08-cv-01655-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

v. Pretrial Hearing: April 7, 2023, at 9:30 a.m.

D. UMPHENOUR, Motions in Limine Hearing: May 10, 2023, at Defendant. 10:00 a.m.

15 Jury Trial: May 23, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB); 2-3 Days

18 Plaintiff Louis Branch is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 109.) 20 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendant Umphenour. 21 The case is ready to be set for jury trial as no dispositive motion was filed. 22 This matter is set for a pretrial conference hearing on April 7, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. The 23 matter is set for a 2 to 3 day jury trial beginning on May 23, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. 24 In preparation of trial, the parties are required to file Pretrial Statements in accordance 25 with the schedule set forth herein. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.