Arisco

(PC) Loftis v. Arisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20231:22-cv-01266California10,687 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARQUISE DEANGELO LOFTIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01266-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE ANAMENDED

v. COMPLAINT ARISCO, et al., ECF No. 1 Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEAD-LINE 15 Plaintiff Marquise DeAngelo Loftis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on September 28, 2022, is currently before he Court for screening. (ECF No. 1.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.