Better Meat Co. v. Emergy, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE BETTER MEAT CO., Case No. 2:21-cv-02338-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 EMERGY, Inc. d/b/a MEATI FOODS, PAUL WRONSKY, AND BOND CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT LP,
16 Defendants. 17 18 Defendant Emergy asks the court to seal various documents related to its anti-SLAPP motion. As explained below, Emergy does not present its request clearly or otherwise meet the high standard necessary for this court to grant sealing, and as such, the court denies the motion, 22 with leave to amend if possible. 23 I. BACKGROUND This motion stems from plaintiff Better Meat’s case against defendants Emergy, Paul Vronsky and Bond Capital. This court has summarized the history behind this action in a 26 previous order and incorporates that summary by reference here. See Prior Order (May 25, 2022), ECF No. 66.
In response to Better Meat’s lawsuit, Emergy filed an anti-SLAPP motion seeking to strike Better Meat’s…