Gilbert v. B & S Dhillon, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20231:22-cv-00547California435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00547-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) B&S DHILLON, INC., et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendants. (ECF No. 30) 16 On January 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 30.) In the notice, Plaintiff dismisses Defendant B & S Dhillon, Inc., doing business as AJ’s Market, without prejudice; and dismisses Defendants Richard P. Barbaccia and Eileen C. Barbaccia, Trustees under the Barbaccia 1989 Revocable Trust dated May 18, 1989, with prejudice. No other defendants remain in this action. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.