Longoria

(PC) Paul E. Duran v. Longoria

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20231:20-cv-00289California2,554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD DURAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00289-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, THIRD SCREENING ORDER DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO FILE NOTICE TO

v. VOLUNTARILY DISMISS DEFENDANTS

AND OTHER CLAIMS DEEMED NOT

LONGORIA, CASE, E. PARKS, M. COGNIZABLE; OR,

GAMBOA, W. SINKOVICH,

STAND ON COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO Defendants. COURT RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AND CLAIMS DEEMED NOT

COGNIZABLE TO THE DISTRICT COURT1

FOURTEEN DAY (14) DEADLINE

18 (Doc. Nos. 19, 21) 19 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is the pro se Second Amended civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Paul Edward Duran—a prisoner. (Doc. No. 19). Upon review, the Court finds the Second Amended Complaint states a First Amendment free exercise of religion claim against Defendant Longoria but fails to state any other cognizable claim against the other named defendants. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.