Riley

Riley v. Acco Engineered Systems

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20231:21-cv-01785California546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARL L. RILEY, III, Case No. 1:21-cv-01785-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT TO PROCEED AND

ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLETE

AND RETURN ENCLOSED SERVICE

Defendant. DOCUMENTS Doc. No. 1 17 This matter is before the court for screening. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff, Earl L. Riley, III, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this discrimination action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended in 1972 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.) and under the general civil rights statutes, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983. (Doc. No.1, Complaint). Plaintiff, an African American, was hired by Defendant as a journeyman sheet metal worker. (Id. at 2). Plaintiff alleges that while other sheet metal workers worked with partners, he was forced to work alone on jobs that required more than one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.