Callejas

(PS) Hawkins v. Callejas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20232:20-cv-00156California2,443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KET HAWKINGS III, No. 2:20-cv-0156 DAD DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND

FAMILY ADULT SERVICES, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Ket Hawkings III is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 41.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and the second amended complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on January 22, 2020, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.