Gastelum
Gastelum v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20231:22-cv-01173California734 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-01173-ADA-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
v. IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS
ACTION
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RETAIN
Defendant. (ECF No. 11)
TEN-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se initiated this action against Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (“Defendant”) on September 14, 2022. (ECF No. 1). On September 28, 2022, the Court set an initial scheduling conference for December 19, 2022, and advised Plaintiff he “shall diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” (ECF No. 3). On December 9, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to prosecute this action and to serve the summons and complaint in a timely manner. (ECF No. 8). …