Gastelum

Gastelum v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 20231:22-cv-01173California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-01173-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

v. IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS

ACTION

BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RETAIN

Defendant. (ECF No. 11)

TEN-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se initiated this action against Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (“Defendant”) on September 14, 2022. (ECF No. 1). On September 28, 2022, the Court set an initial scheduling conference for December 19, 2022, and advised Plaintiff he “shall diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” (ECF No. 3). On December 9, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to prosecute this action and to serve the summons and complaint in a timely manner. (ECF No. 8). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.