Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 19, 20231:21-cv-01193California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:21-cv-01193-ADA-HBK Plaintiff, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S CONSTRUED

MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FED. R. CIV.

v. P. 41(a)(2) I.Z. JONES, et al., (ECF No. 159) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s construed motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). (ECF No. 159; see also ECF No. 162). Plaintiff stated that he wishes to dismiss the entire action without prejudice. (ECF No. 159.) Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 163). Rule 41(a)(2) states, in relevant part: [A]n action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order on terms the court considers proper . . . . Unless the order states otherwise, a dismissal under this paragraph (2) is without prejudice. 24 Trial courts have broad discretion to grant motions for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2). See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.