Kurgan

(PC) Garcia v. Kurgan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20232:22-cv-01068California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LUCIEN GARCIA, Case No. 2:22-cv-01068-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On November 14, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it alleged cognizable excessive force and retaliation claims against defendant Kurgan. I notified him that its other claims were not viable. ECF No. 19. I gave plaintiff thirty days either to file an amended complaint or to advise the court if he wished to stand by his current complaint and proceed only with his excessive force and retaliation claims against defendant Kurgan. Id. at 6. To date, plaintiff has filed neither an amended complaint nor a notice of election to proceed on the cognizable claims. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.