(PC) Iseli v. State of CA (CDCR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20232:22-cv-01792California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:22-cv-1792 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

SATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 By order filed October 19, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On December 8, 2022, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. Thirty days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Plaintiff filed multiple notices and one supplement, most of which bear all of plaintiff’s case numbers for cases he has filed in the Eastern District (ECF Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.