Farhat

(PC) Hearne v. Farhat

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20232:20-cv-00557California6,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 DAD DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had documented enemies where he was attacked and injured. Presently before the court is defendants’ fully briefed motion for summary judgment and motion to stay the discovery and scheduling order. (ECF Nos. 80, 81.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant the motion to stay and recommend that the motion for summary judgment be granted. BACKGROUND I. Relevant Procedural History Plaintiff initiated this action by filing the original complaint. (ECF No. 1.) The court screened the complaint and gave plaintiff the option to proceed with the complaint as screened or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.