Gilbert v. Sacramento/Dunnigan Holding. Co Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20232:22-cv-01639California1,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, No. 2:22-cv-1639 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO/DUNNIGAN HOLDING CO INC dba WATT AVE CHEVRON, HARWANT KAUR KANG, Defendants. 17 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. See U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter has been reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff’s complaint alleges a federal claim for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as California state law claims for violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act and the California Health and Safety Code. (Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 2.) On December 8, 2022, the Court issued plaintiff an order to show cause as to why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the complaint’s state law claims. (ECF No. 14.) On December 22, 2022, plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.