(PS) Gonshorowski v. CA Natural Resources Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20232:22-cv-01289California2,804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANALEAH GONSHOROWSKI AND No. 2:22-cv-1289 DAD DB PS

RICHARD BOITEAU,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES

AGENCY, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Analeah Gonshorowski and Richard Boiteau are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendant California Natural Resources Agency’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 6.) For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on July 21, 2022, by filing a complaint and paying the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint’s allegations are difficult to decipher but concern entry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.