Nappen

(PC) Messiah v. Nappen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20232:22-cv-01578California2,981 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MESSIAH MESSIAH, No. 2:22-cv-1578 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

R. NAPPEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that his rights were violated when he was improperly deprived of his property. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and recommend that the complaint be dismissed. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.