Sodergren

(PS) Ciurar v. Sodergren

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20232:20-cv-02089California2,941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAGDALINA C. CIURAR, No. 2:20-cv-2089 DAD DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Magdalina C. Ciurar is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court is defendant Anne Sodergren’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 13.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted and plaintiff’s amended complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on October 19, 2020, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application was granted on April 1, 2021.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.