(PC) Kendrix v. Sacramento Main Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20232:22-cv-01502California422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS ANTHONY KENDRIX, No. 2:22-cv-1502 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO MAIN JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 29, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 7. In those objections, plaintiff argues his constitutional rights were violated by deputies’ intentional and wrongful deprivation of his property. See id. at 2. This court assumes the truth of plaintiff’s allegations, see Ashcroft…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.