(PC) Pratt v. Sacramento Protection Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20232:22-cv-02117California1,792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE PRATT, JR., No. 2:22-cv-2117 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO PROTECTION SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a pretrial detainee, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 19 This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 21 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 22 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. 23 §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee in 24 accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct 25 the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and 26 forward it to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.