Warren

(PC) Hardney v. Warren

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20232:16-cv-00172California542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN HARDNEY, Case No. 2:16-cv-00172-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND

v. TO SET THIS CASE FOR A FURTHER

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

R. WARREN, et al., ECF Nos. 145 & 149 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has filed a motion asking that he be appointed counsel and that this case be set for a second settlement conference. ECF Nos. 145 & 149. The undersigned has reviewed the docket and believes that at this time a settlement conference would be unlikely to be productive. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to set another settlement conference, ECF No. 149, is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court lacks the authority to require an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.