Crownholm

Crownholm v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 20232:22-cv-01720California7,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN CROWNHOLM, et al.,, No. 2:22-cv-01720-DAD-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

RICHARD B. MOORE, et al., (Doc. No. 15) Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on the motion to dismiss filed by Richard B. Moore, Rossana D’Antonio, Michael Hartley, Fel Amistad, Alireza Asgari, Duane Friel, Kathy Jones Irish, Coby King, Elizabeth Mathieson, Paul Novak, Mohammad Qureshi, Frank Ruffino, Wilfredo Sanchez, and Christina Wong (“defendants”) on November 18, 2022. (Doc. No. 15.) A hearing by video was held on the pending motion on January 17, 2023. Attorney Paul Avelar appeared for plaintiffs. Deputy Attorney General Sharon O’Grady appeared on behalf of defendants. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant defendants’ motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Crown Capital Adventures, Inc., a Delaware corporation registered as a foreign corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.