Pierce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETRIUS K. BRASHEAR, No. 2:22-cv-0902 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

C. PIERCE, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed November 15, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On December 14, 2022, the order was re-served on plaintiff. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and…