(PS)McGee

(PS)McGee v. Mansfiled

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20232:21-cv-02216California326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILOMENA G. MCGEE and No. 2:21-cv-2216-KJM-KJN PS DONALD M. BIRD, No. 2:22-cv-1456-KJM-KJN PS 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. (2:21-cv-2216 at ECF No. 28.) (2:22-cv-1456 at ECF No. 15.) KIMBERLY MANSFIELD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On December 5, 2022 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (2:21-cv-2216 at ECF No. 28; 2:22-cv-1456 at ECF No. 15), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On December 13, 2022 plaintiffs filed objections to the findings and recommendations (2:22-cv-1456 at ECF No. 16), which have been considered by the court. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.