Auld
(PC) Fialho v. Auld
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SCOTT FRANK FIALHO, No. 2:21-cv-1698 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AULD, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 27, 2021 and May 20, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations. Each set of findings and recommendations was served on plaintiff and contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to either set of findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey,…