Higgins

(PC) Gray v. Higgins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20232:22-cv-00555California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD EUGENE GRAY, JR., No. 2:22-CV-0555-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HIGGINS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On November 2, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.1 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.