Crounse

(PC) Villery v. Crounse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20231:18-cv-01623California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARED M. VILLERY, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-1623 JLT SKO (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE D. CROUSNE, et al., ) THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 133) ) )

Jared M. Villery seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to obey the Court’s order and failed to prosecute this action. (Doc. 133.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 4.) The Court granted the parties 14 days to file any written objections. (Id. at 5.) In addition, the Court advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.