(PC) Villery v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20231:15-cv-00987California737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED M. VILLERY, No. 1:15-cv-00987-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF No. 182) RICHARD KENDALL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jared M. Villery (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Kendall, Acosta, Jones, Guerrero, Woodward,1 and Grimmig for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and against Defendant Macomber2 for promulgation of a policy to deny single cell housing for inmates with serious mental disorders in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff’s claims arise out of allegations that he developed Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”) while in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff claims that at multiple institutions and over several years, his

1 Erroneously sued as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.