Wood

Wood v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20232:20-cv-00497California5,038 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 BRANDY WOOD, No. 2:20-cv-00497 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND corporation; LEAH ANTONETTI, in PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARIAL her individual capacity as a law SUMMARY ADJUDICATION enforcement officer for the Sacramento Police Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 18 Defendants.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiff Brandy Wood (“plaintiff”) brought this 22 section 1983 action against the City of Sacramento, Officer Leah 23 Antonetti (“Antonetti”), and DOES 1-50 for various alleged 24 constitutional and state tort offenses. (See Fourth Amended 25 Complaint (“FAC”) (Docket No. 46).) The case arises out of 26 events on March 4, 2019, wherein plaintiff injured her foot at a 27 Black Lives Matter protest. (Id.) 28 The Fourth Amended Complaint asserts four constitutional claims under section 1983 and five state law claims:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.