Cates

(PC) Mayberry v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 20231:22-cv-01177California374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL CHARLES MAYBERRY, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-1177 JLT BAM (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING ) BRIAN CATES, ) THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE ) Defendant. ) (Doc. 10) ) )

On December 22, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge screened the First Amended Complaint and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 10.) The magistrate judge observed that Plaintiff was previously “provided with the relevant legal standards” and failed to cure the deficiencies of his pleadings. (Id. at 11.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. (Id.) The Court granted Plaintiff 14 days to file any objections to the Findings and Recommendations, following service on December 22, 2022. (Doc. 10 at 11.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.