Anderson
Anderson v. State of California
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 20231:22-cv-01391California1,143 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAYUMI ANDERSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-01391-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
v. (ECF No. 2) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DUE
TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH A COURT ORDER AND LOCAL
RULE 183(b) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
19 Plaintiff Mayumi Anderson is proceeding pro se in this civil action filed on October 28, 2022, against the State of California, Judge Ernest J. LiCalsi, Attorney Thomas J. Holthus, McCarthy Holthus, LLP, and M&T Bank. (ECF No. 1). Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with a court order and Local Rule 183(b), both of which require a plaintiff to notify the Court of 23 the plaintiff’s current address, the Court will vacate the scheduling conference and recommend 24 that this…