Workforce Defense League v. Clayco, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 WORKFORCE DEFENSE LEAGUE, No. 2:22-cv-00503-JAM-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
CLAYCO, INC.; and UNITED MOTION TO STRIKE
CONTRACTOR SERVICES, LLC
13 Defendants. 14 Clayco, Inc and United Contractor Services, LLC (“Defendants”) petition the Court to strike portions of Workforce Defense League’s (“Plaintiff”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) as immaterial, namely Plaintiff’s allegations relating to: (1) meal and rest break violations and (2) relief under statutes other than § 218.7. See Mot. to Strike (“Mot.”), ECF No. 26. Plaintiff opposes the motion, in part, noting the Court’s prior order relating to this case. See Opp’n, ECF No. 27, at 1. Defendants replied. See Reply, ECF No. 28. For the reasons set forth below, this Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion.1
1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The…