Manning

(PC) Wilson v. Manning

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20232:21-cv-01801California3,278 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TREVELL BUCEAN WILSON, No. 2:21-cv-1801 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TODD MANNING, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis On January 13, 2023, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because plaintiff’s application stated that he had $1,100.00 available, and his trust account statement showed that he had “maintained an account balance ranging between $1,041 and $1,751 in the four months preceding the initiation of this action.” ECF No. 16. Plaintiff has now filed objections to the findings and recommendations in which he states that the money reflected in his application was from his one-time, economic impact payment, that his trust account balance is now below $60.00, and that he does not have any current income. ECF No. 17. A copy of a more…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.