Clendenin

(PC) Felix v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 20231:19-cv-01784California654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, Case No. 1:19-cv-01784-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

RENEWED MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT

v. OF COUNSEL, IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STATUS, AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO

CLENDENIN, et al., OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT

Defendants. (ECF No. 60)

12 Plaintiff Scott Emerson Felix (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). As Plaintiff is a civil detainee and has paid the filing fee, he is not a prisoner or proceeding in forma pauperis, and therefore the Court ordered the complaint to be served without screening. (ECF No. 13.) This action therefore proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint, filed 20 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.