Attinello

(PC) Banks v. Attinello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20231:23-cv-00112California393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBBIE BANKS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00112-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION ATTINELLO, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

Defendant. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED

16 (ECF No. 2)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Robbie Banks (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on January 25, 2023, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On January 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed a certified copy of her prison trust account statement. (ECF No. 6.) Examination of Plaintiff’s trust account statement reveals that Plaintiff is able to afford the costs of this action. Specifically, Plaintiff’s current available balance in her inmate trust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.