(HC) Reginald Tanubagijo v. Daniel Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD TANUBAGIJO, No. 2:18-cv-02290-MCE-CKD P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DANIEL PARAMO, Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a first amended federal habeas corpus application filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 27. Petitioner challenges his conviction following a jury trial in the Solano County Superior Court for second degree murder and assault of a child causing death. Petitioner was sentenced to 25 years to life in state prison. In his amended habeas application, petitioner contends that he was denied his right to an impartial and unbiased juror because “a mischievous juror… continue[d] using his cell phone [to send tweets] throughout [the] entire trial.” ECF No. 27 at 5. Upon careful consideration of the record and the applicable law, the undersigned recommends denying petitioner’s habeas corpus application for the reasons set forth below. ///// /////…