Remmert

Remmert v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20231:23-cv-00050California738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIRLEY V. REMMERT, EVA AL- Case No. 1:23-cv-00050-ADA-HBK

ZAGHARI,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF SHIRLEY REMMERT’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS 14 GAVIN NEWSOME, ET. AL., (Doc. No. 2) 15 Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO PAY FILING FEE OR SUBMIT FULLY

COMPLETED IFP APPLICATIONS

17 30-DAY DEADLINE

20 21 On January 11, 2023, Plaintiffs Shirley V. Remmert (Remmert) and Eva Al-Zaghari, (Al- Zaghari) initiated this action by filing a pro se complaint. (Doc. No. 1, Complaint). Both Plaintiffs Rembert and Al-Zaghari signed the Complaint. (Id. at 11-12). Only Plaintiff Remmert filed an application seeking to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff Remmert states she receives $1153.73 in social security each month, has $500.00 in a checking or savings account, has no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.