Puhr

Puhr v. Canady

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20232:21-cv-01858California1,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER PUHR, No. 2:21-cv-01858-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROGER CANADY, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Roger Canady and Daniel Torres’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff Christopher Puhr (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 14.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 On October 7, 2019, Plaintiff was inside his home in Vacaville, California, when he noticed Vacaville Police Officer Canady “molesting his vehicle and exited his home to investigate.” (ECF No. 11 at 3.) Plaintiff alleges that Canady, armed with a firearm, accused Plaintiff of being on drugs, demanded to see his arms for track marks, and arrested him. (Id.) Canady proceeded to search…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.