(PS) Iliya v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20232:22-cv-01305California2,280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAUDA ILIYA, No. 2:22-cv-1305-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST COMPLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT. On January 31, 2023, the court conducted a pretrial scheduling conference in this matter.1 Plaintiff appeared on his own behalf; attorney Nicole Cahill appeared on behalf of defendants. After considering the parties’ joint status report (ECF No. 15) and the parties’ representations at the scheduling conference, the court issues the following pretrial scheduling order.2 26 1 This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 27 2 The court has made some modifications to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.