Castillo

Castillo v. Geisser

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20232:22-cv-00588California3,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY R. CASTILLO, No. 2:22-cv-00588-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICK GEISSER, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Mick Geisser, Gabriel Hollingshead, Maris Goldsborough, and Robert Thompson’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff Rudy Castillo (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 On April 1, 2020, Plaintiff was driving home with his girlfriend and children in his vehicle. (ECF No. 1 at 4.) When Plaintiff arrived at his residence, he parked his vehicle on the front lawn. (Id.) After Plaintiff parked, his girlfriend and children exited the vehicle. (Id.) Shortly thereafter, Plaintiff was approached by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.