(HC)Singh

(HC)Singh v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20232:21-cv-01731California308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, Case No. 2:21-cv-01731-TLN-JDP Petitioner, v. ORDER CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 30, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.