Dorothy

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20232:21-cv-02176California245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:21-cv-02176-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER DOROTHY, et al., Defendant. 16 On December 13, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. /// /// /// Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.