(PC) Pull v. Harbour Deputy Bailiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD JAMES PULL, No. 1:22-cv-01422-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION DEPUTY BAILIFF HARBOUR, et al., (Doc. 15) Defendants. 16 On January 13, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 15.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within 14 days after service. (Id.) Plaintiff filed objections on January 30, 2023.1 (Doc. 16.) According to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the

23 1 Plaintiff also seeks the appointment of counsel, but he does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action. Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), rev’d in part on other grounds, 154 F.3d…