Nolan

Nolan v. Kelly

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 20232:21-cv-02210California1,554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN NOLAN, No. 2:21-cv-02210-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER SEAN KELLY and DUSTIN WILLIS, Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Sean Kelly and Dustin Willis’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff Steven Nolan (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 11.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 14.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 On December 1, 2019, Plaintiff was disc jockeying at a venue in Vacaville, California. (ECF No. 8 at 3.) While Plaintiff was performing, one of his acquaintances notified him that Plaintiff’s friends had just been involved in a motor vehicle accident nearby. (Id.) Out of concern for the safety of his friends, Plaintiff left work and went towards the scene of the accident to try to render…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.